SOURCE: THE GURU PAPERS
(p17) …..in judging whether a hierarchy is essentially authoritarian or not, one faces the following considerations:
-
What is its purpose?
-
Who decides if its purpose is being fulfilled and how is this decided?
-
How free are the members of the hierarchy to enter and leave it? That is, how much coercion is involved in getting people to belong and stay?
-
How responsive is it to change from within or without, and how open is it to internal and external feedback? This includes who determines what is even considered relevant feedback.
-
In what direction does the power flow? Does it only flow from top to bottom, or are there mechanisms within the structure of the hierarchy that give the lower rungs a say in who the higher rungs are and what they do?
(p57) Any of the following are strong indications of belonging to an authoritarian group:
-
No deviation from the party line is allowed. Anyone who has thoughts or feelings contrary to the accepted perspective is made to feel wrong or bad for having them.
-
Whatever the authority does is regarded as perfect or right. Thus behaviors that would be questioned in others are made to seem different and proper.
-
One trusts that the leader or others in the group know what’s best.
-
It is difficult to communicate with anyone not in the group.
-
One finds oneself defending actions of the leader (or other members) without having firsthand knowledge of what occurred.
-
At times one is confused and fearful without knowing why. This is a sign that doubts are being repressed.
Kramer, J.& Alstad, D. (1993). The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian Power. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books/Frog Ltd.